COHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LGL Group has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.08%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $108.13, signalling upside risk potential of 95.04%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.21%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than LGL Group.

Coherent has a beta of 1.883, which suggesting that the stock is 88.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.692%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 89.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.62x versus 16.46x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of -15.14%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $108.13, signalling upside risk potential of 95.04%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $95.88 which suggests that it could grow by 60.3%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Coherent has a beta of 1.883, which suggesting that the stock is 88.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.121%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.62x versus 2.88x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.02%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $108.13, signalling upside risk potential of 95.04%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $110.18 which suggests that it could grow by 80.74%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

Coherent has a beta of 1.883, which suggesting that the stock is 88.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.62x versus 9.15x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 7.21% compared to Coherent's net margin of 56.17%. Coherent's return on equity of 0.89% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Coherent has a consensus price target of $108.13, signalling upside risk potential of 95.04%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $168.01 which suggests that it could grow by 46.96%. Given that Coherent has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Coherent is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Coherent has a beta of 1.883, which suggesting that the stock is 88.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Coherent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Coherent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coherent quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Coherent's net income of $103.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Coherent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 38.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coherent is 1.62x versus 21.73x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.